I also like that ReadyAPI allows you to read the data from CFC and Excel. You can write a small Groovy script that lets you execute just five resources out of the ten resources. In your test case, you can use a Groovy script that says that in a particular test case, you have ten resources, but you just want to exhibit five and that you don't want to exhibit the remaining five. In ReadyAPI, you can customize your environment, set it up, then start working on it.Īnother feature worth mentioning that's offered in ReadyAPI is automating your test value as the tool allows Groovy scripting. In my company, you work in different environments, such as QA, UAT, and LT, so the URLs for every environment are different. I have the option to just parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere.Īnother valuable feature of ReadyAPI is that it provides a customized environment. I'm working with more than two hundred resources, so I don't have to go and make a small change at each point every time. "One of the features of ReadyAPI that's worth mentioning is that it allows you to parameterize. You can use it with stuff other than the web performance." We are using specific ports to send queries, and assess the performance based on the time it takes these queries to respond. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it." "I use all the tools, but one feature that stands out is JMeter's ability to test when services are sending a particular kind of request. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline.
There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. Apache JMeter allows you to focus on analyzing the situation, looking into measurements, response time, and client-server responses, which I find valuable." "The most valuable feature of this solution is that it is free." "The scripting ability is most valuable. Apache JMeter also creates threads with good server utilization. It's the best load-testing tool for my company because Apache JMeter simulates your application during testing. Its deployment is also very easy." "This solution is easier to use than any other tool in the market there is not even a requirement to learn a lot of scripting in order to use it." "To me, what's most valuable in Apache JMeter is that it's a lightweight tool for application testing. It allows us to extend and add additional functionality and features. It's easy to configure and adjusting the virtual users according to the DPS we want to achieve." "It is open source as well as relatively extendable. With JMeter user can do testing other than load testing for example Stress Test, Functional Test, Distributed Test."It is cost-effective and simple to use." "JMeter lets us generate virtual users and T-load, per our requirements. So, basically what we did was we simulated 50 users accessing one API endpoint over 10 seconds (5 every second).Īs you can see it is pretty clear that its very easy to test the API with the number of virtual users with just a simple change in Thread Group configuration.
So don’t worry about the result, if you have different values than mine. You might be having different results than me based on what your REST API endpoint does and based on other factors, such as geographical distance (which generally increases latency), the size of the requested item (which increases transfer time) etc. This is fairly a high value for a simple Rest API, but in my case, this endpoint does few heavy tasks and that is acceptable for me.
After that, the Sample Time (ms)and Latency columns are probably the most interests columns in the result set. We can see that the Status of all the requests in the above screenshot is “Success” (indicated by a green shield with a tick in it).
0 kommentar(er)
